Monday, May 20, 2019
Case study of yellow auto company Essay
Kelly and two opposite westerners working in lacquer on the park syllabus had a dispute with their japanese supervisor over range leave. This report aims to analyze the decisions and issues in the slighton study from a personality and value perspective.The key decisions identified argon in relation to enlisting, accept and breeding. The gush program did not require the ALT candidates to sacrifice any knowledge of Nipponese. The salaries received by the JET participants wereconsidered unfair by their Nipponese colleagues. The pin down received by the JET participants were double and imprecise. In plus, the Japanese employees in the host institution expected the unknowners to work like the Japanese rather than interest the terms of their scram. The program provided pre-departure training for JET participants, further did not provide the same train of training for Japanese employees on how to work with foreigners.Based on Hofstedes framework, it is found that the weaknesses of the decisions were mainly due to the divagations in values of Japanese and western tillages. Japan is a society with lavishly power distance, extremely high suspense avoidance, strong collectivism, strong masculinity and a long-term vision, whereas western societies have almost the opposer values. The seniority-based salary system, lifetime employment, the expectation to conform to social norms, dedication to work, loyalty to the employers and a male-dominated workplace are on the whole features of the Japanese management system that the JET participants were unaware of.It is recommended that the JET program reassess its recruitment policy to include Japanese as a compulsory unavoidableness for candidates, and adjust the salary big money to reflect the seniority-based culture. It is also recommended to pen a rigorous contract to avoid any ambiguity. In addition to making the pre-departure training compulsory, Japanese employees should receive the same level of transverse-cultural training. Moreover, better Personality-Job equip and Person-Organization fit may be achieved if applicants personalities are fulfiln into account in the recruitment process.- 7 1. INTRODUCTIONKelly, Mark, Andrea and Suzanne, all in their 20s, were hired by the JET program to work in Japan. During their placement, there was a bitter dispute betwixt them and Mr. Higashi, the supervisor of the foreign JET participants, over sick(p) leave. This report aims to explore the criticaldecisions and issues in this case from a personality and values perspective. Firstly, the critical decisions regarding recruitment, contract and training leave be analyzed. Secondly, there will be a discussion of the issues in subject area culture, values and personality. Finally, recommendations will be provided to facilitate future improvement.2. CRITICAL DECISIONS2.1 Key Decision 1 recruitmentThe JET program made the decision of hiring native English speakers to assist in fore ign lyric poem t separatelying in Japan. The positions of Coordinator for International Relations (CIR) and Assistant Language T all(prenominal)er (ALT) both required the candidates to have a university degree and an interest in Japan. CIRs were required to have a functional knowledge of Japanese, but ALTs were not required to do so. The in a higher(prenominal) place recruitment decision recognized the importance of native-speakers in foreign language teaching and the educational background of the candidates, however, the lack of Japanese language requirement for ALTs was a original flaw in the recruitment decision. This language barrier ca engrossd difficulty in communication between the Japanese employees and JET participants. In addition, Mr. Higashi had to act as an interpreter because he was the only person who could speak English.Kelly, Mark, Andrea and Suzanne were raw and in knowd, yet they were paid the same salary as Japanese supervisors in the host institution. Accord ing to Adhikari (2005) and Hofstede (1993), Japan has a unique culture in which employees salaries are based on seniority rather than position. It is thusly unsurprising that the Japanese employees, all worked for more than 20 years in their career, felt uncomfortable almost the salary of the JET participants. 2.2 Key Decision 2 ContractAll the JET participants in the speckle had a standard North American contract which set out the working hours, number of vacation days and sick leave they were entitled to. However afterward Kelly, Mark and Suzanne fell ill, they wereforced to use 2 paid vacation days rather than sick leave, which caused a serious tension between the JETs and Mr. Higashi.The strength of the contract was that it stated a set of rules for the JET participants to follow, but the weakness was that it was not strictly written. Shaules (2008) argues that western contracts are explicit and detailed, whereas Japanese contracts can be flexible and open to interpretation . This cultural difference is reflected in the contract received by the JET participants.The definitions of paid leave, paid holidays and special holidays were ambiguous and they seemed to be used interchangeably within the contract. Section 1 of Article 11 says that the JET participants are entitled to 20 paid holidays, but Section 3 of Article 12 says that the special holidays (including sick leave) are paid holidays. Depending on the interpretation of paid holidays and special holidays, these two clauses either contradict with each other or repeat themselves.Apart from the wording of the contract, the ability to honour the contract was also problematic. Although the JET participants acted within the terms of their contract, their Japanese colleagues still expected them to stay past 5pm on weekdays and work on Saturdays. The contract said that a doctors certificate was only required if the JET participants took tierce or more consecutive days of sick leave, but Mr. Higashi asked Kelly to bring in the note change surface though she only took 2 days sick leave. 2.3 Key Decision 3 upbringingThe Conference of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) provided the JET participants with lots of information about working and living in Japan, and offered pre-departure training sessions about life in Japan and its potential problems.The strength of the above decision was that it recognized the cultural differences of Japan and western countries and the challenges faced by those JET participants working in Japan. The weaknesses of the decision were thatit did not make the pre-departure training sessions compulsory, and it did not offer similar training sessions for Japanese employees on the cultural differences and problems of working with westerners.The consequences of the above weaknesses were that Kelly found herself in unfamiliar and difficult situations because she had no experience or knowledge of the Japanese workplace. Had she atcourseed the tr aining sessions, she would have been better prepared for the difficulties of working in some other country. Similarly, due to poor knowledge and understanding, the Japanese colleagues disapproved the lack of commitment of the JET participants, and did not know how to grass with them in an effective and harmonious manner. If the Japanese employees had received training on working with westerners, they would have had a better working relationship with the JET participants.3. ISSUES3.1 National burnishs and ValuesThe weaknesses of the key decisions discussed in Section 2 mainly rooted from the differences in national cultures and values. Hofstedes (1980, 1983, 1991, 1993, 2001) role model for Assessing Cultures provides a theoretical ground for cross cultural management and research. The framework identified five value dimensions of national culture power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, masculinity/femininity, and long/short-term orientation. The GLOBE F ramework (House, et al., 2001 House, Javidan and Dorfman, 2002 Javidan, et al., 2005 Robbins and Judge, 2007) further extended Hofstedes Framework to include assertiveness, in-group collectivism, performance orientation and humane orientation.Because the JET participants in the case study came from Canada, Great Britain and united States, the western cultures and values discussed below will refer to these specific countries. According to Hofstedes (2001) findings, Japan has a higher power distance than western cultures, although the difference is not significant. However, Japan rank notably higher inuncertainty avoidance, collectivism, masculinity and long-term orientation. 3.1.1 Power DistanceJapan has a seniority-based promotion and riposte management system and a highly hierarchical society in general (Adhikari, 2005 Oishi, et al. 2005 Shaules 2008). This is mainly influenced by the Confucian values which emphasize hierarchy and harmony. Mr. Higashi acted more like a father th an a manager, because in a traditional Confucian family, the father is the head and always at the top of the hierarchy. Unaware of these Japanese values, the JET participants constantly challenged the authority of their supervisors. As a result, the Japanese employees working at the senior level were annoyed that these inexperienced five-year-old foreigners were hired to tell them how to do their jobs. Moreover, paying a manager-level salary to these young foreigners were also against the Japanese norm of a seniority-based salary system. 3.1.2 Uncertainty AvoidanceAdhikari (2005), Brightman (2005) and Shaules (2008) all agree that Japanese culture expects everyone to conform to social norms and discourages individualism. This confirms the high uncertainty avoidance in Japanese society as claimed by Hofstede. Uncertainty avoidance was the reason wherefore Mr. Higashi insisted to deal with the foreign JETS in the Japanese way. Because Mr. Higashi had lived all his life in Japan, the belief of conforming to social norms was deeply rooted in him. Shaules (2008) asserts that Japanese opt to resolve conflicts in an in carry on and mediated manner, whereas westerners tend to adopt a direct rule-based approach. This explains why the JET participants clearly referred to the contract and tried to resolve the sick leave issue with Mr. Higashi in a direct manner. On the other hand, even though Mr. Higashi was extremely agitated, he still chose to resolve the matter through the accountant rather than clarifying it there and then. 3.1.3 CollectivismVarious literature (Adhikari, 2005 Brightman, 2005 Javidan et al., 2005 Lucier et al., 1992 Oishi et al., 2005 Shaules, 2008 Wang et al., 2005) claims that Japan is a highly collective society, which means that the needs of a group are always viewed as more master(prenominal) than individual needs, andindividuals are expected to sacrifice their own needs if there is a conflict between them. On the contrary, western societies tend to encourage individualism (Hofstede, 1991 Javidan et al., 2005). Scholars believe that the strong level of collectivism in Japan is due to the influence of Confucian values, which emphasize group orientation, relationships between individuals and showing respect (Fang, 2003, Wang et al., 2005 Yan, 2004). This explains why Japanese employees are so dedicated to their work and have great loyalty to their employers, whereas the JET participants elect to use every single day of their holiday and fulfil their personal goals. 3.1.4 MasculinityJapan ranked No.1 in masculinity in Hofstedes (2001) findings. Women often leave their work to look after the family after assumeting married, therefore, very few women work at the senior management level in Japan (Adhikari, 2005 Kei et al., 2010). This was the reason why all senior Japanese employees in the JET program were men. This also explains why Mr. Higashi kept asking Kelly to sign up to flower arranging classes or tea ceremony, as t hese were traditionally considered womens activities. 3.1.5 Long-term OrientationJapan has a long-term oriented culture whereas western cultures tend to be short-term oriented (Lucier et al., 1992 Fang, 2003). One of the key characteristics of Japanese-style management is lifetime employment (Adhikari, 2005 Lucier et al., 1992). This was why the Japanese employees and supervisors all complained that the JET participants were never long enough to become part of the team, as they viewed the organization as a long-term family. On the other hand, Kelly had a short-term aim to make money, see the other part of the world and improve her Japanese. With this mismatch between the goals of the Japanese and western employees, neither of them could understand each other. 3.2 PersonalityThe puffy Five Model identified five factors of personality extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness to experience (Robbins and Judge, 2007 Roccas et al., 2002). It was clear tha t the JET participants and the Japanese employees had very different personalities. For example, Mark is an introvert who prefers to work alone, whereas mostJapanese employees tend to be extroverts who enjoy social gatherings after work. Mr. Higashi and other Japanese employees are highly conscientious whereas the JET participants are less so. The JET participants have lower emotional stability because they tend to get angry and distressed easily.In fix to increase employee job satisfaction and reduce turnover, Holland (1996) and Gardner et al. (2012) promote the scheme of Personality-Job fit and Person-Organization fit. This means to fit an individuals personality with the characteristics of the job and the organization. The JET program should conduct from the issues identified in this report and aim to increase the Personality-Job fit and Person-Organization fit in its future recruitment process.4. CONCLUSIONThis report analyzed the critical decisions and issues in the case stu dy from a personality and values perspective. The analysis was mainly based on Hofstedes Framework, together with the Big Five Model, GLOBE Framework and Hollands Person-Job Fit theory. It has been identified that the weaknesses of the decisions were mainly due to the lack of mutual understanding in culture and values. Different personalities also affected the harmony of the work relationship in this case. The next section will list the recommended actions in order to overcome the weaknesses identified in the analysis.5. RECOMMENDATIONSThe JET program is advised to take the following actions1. to introduce Japanese language requirements for all JET participants 2. to assess the applicants personality in order to increase Personality-Job fit and Person-Organization fit 3. to revise the remuneration package of JET participants so that they receive less salary than the Japanese supervisors 4. to appoint a lawyer experienced in employment contract to draft a detailed and rigorous contra ct 5. to make pre-departure training and orientation a compulsory requirement for JET participants 6. to provide cross-cultural training to Japanese employees 7. to consider extending themaximum term of the JET participants contract or even consider offering permanent positions.- 7 REFERENCESAdhikari, D. R. (2005) National Factors and Employment Relations in Japan, Japan Institute of Labour Policy and Training, Tokyo. Available from accessed 30/10/2013.Brightman, J.D. (2005) Asian Culture plan Japan, National Technical Assistance Centre, 2(6), available from accessed 31/10/2013Fang, T. (2003) A critique of Hofstedes fifth part national culture dimension, International Journal of Cross ethnical Management, 3(3), pp.347-368.Gardner, W.L., Reithel, B.J., Cogliser, C.C., Walumbwa, F.O. and Foley, R.T. (2012), Matching personality and organizational culture effects of recruitment strategy and the Five-Factor Model on Subjective Person-Organization Fit, Management parley Quarterly, 26( 4), pp.585-622.Hofstede, G. (1980) Cultures Consequences International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA Sage.Hofstede, G. (1983) Dimensions of National Cultures in Fifty Countries and Three Regions, In J.B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec and R.C. Annis (eds.) Expiscations in Cross-cultural Psychology, pp. 335-355. Lisse Swets and Zeitlinger.Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations Software of the Mind. London McGraw-Hill.Hofstede, G. (1993) Cultural Constraints in Management Theories, Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), pp. 81-94.Hofstede, G. (2001) Cultures Consequences Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.Holland, J.L. (1996) Exploring careers with a typology What we have learned and some reinvigorated directions, American Psychologist, 51, pp.397-406.House, R., Javidan, M.,Hanges, P. and Dorfman, P. (2001) Project GLOBE An Introduction, Applied Psychology An international Review, 50(4), pp.48 9-505.House, R., Javidan, M. and Dorfman, P. (2002) Understanding cultures and implicit lead theories across the globe an introduction to project GLOBE, Journal of World Business, 37, pp. 3-10.Javidan, M., Stahl., G.K., Brodbeck, F. and Wilderom, C.P.M. (2005) Cross-border transfer of knowledge Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE, Academy of Management Executive, 19(2), pp. 59-76.Kei, K., Koichi, T. and Miwako, H. (2010) The survey of Japanese value orientation analysis of trends over thirty-five years, NHK Broadcasting Studies, Japan.Lucier, C., Boucher, M. White, J. Cangemi, J. and Kowalski, C. (1992) Exploring values of Japanese and American management systems, Education, 112(4), pp. 487-498. Oishi, S., Hajm, J., Schimmack, U., Radhakrishan, P., Dzokoto, V. and Ahadi, S. (2005), The measurement of values across cultures a pairwise comparison approach, Journal of Research and Personality, 39, pp.299-305.Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T. A. (2007) Organizational Behaviour, 12th Ed. New Jersey Prentice Hall.Roccas, S. Sagiv, L., Schwarts, S.H. and Knafo, A. (2002) The Big Five personality factors and personal values, PSPB, 28(6), pp.789-801.Shaules, J. (2008) The deep culture of Japanese values, tcworld, available from accessed 30/10/2013.Wang, J., Wang, G.G., Ruona, W.E.A. and Rojewski, J.W.(2005), Confucian values and the implications for international HRD, Human Resource Development International, 8(3), pp.311-326.Yan, J. (2004) The influence of Confucian political orientation on conflict in Chinese family business, International Journal of Cross Culture Management, 4(1), pp. 5-17.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.